Italianbasket « forum (Archivio Storico)

vabè dai è solo una battuta, io spero ancora che si ripigli il mago.. un po' di autoironia non guasta neanche al più intransigente dei bargnanisti

Chi avrebbe mai detto che spurs-warriors finiva con entrambe sotto gli 80 punti, comunque oggi buonissimi minuti di marco che sta difendendo davvero come mai mi sarei aspettato, peccato solo che offensivamente sia un pò accantonato ma pop non ho dubbi che saprà come integrarlo anche da quel punto di vista, in ogni caso gli spurs vanno che è una meraviglia

chi avrebbe mai detto due anni fa che popovich avrebbe messo il bilino in campo a 5sec dalla fine per difendere su Iggy il tiro decisivo
questo ragazzo ogni anno fa uno step
fantastico

Belinelli è un grande difensore.
Vederlo così in maglia Spurs é una goduria.

Stephen A. Smith criticizes Bulls management for not re-signing Nate and Marco ("you keep Belinelli, you keep Nate Robinson...come hell or high water"), the major impact being the Bulls won't get past Indiana or Miami in the playoffs, another possibly Rose starts to look for a way out of Chicago.

As much as I like the Spurs, I still think the Bulls was and is a better fit for Marco. I also thought Dunleavy wasn't meant to be Marco's replacement, but a complementary piece off the bench. What could have been...a bench of Kirk-Marco-Dunleavy-Taj, would have been nice. Too bad.

http://espn.go.com/espnradio/play?id=9951299

sundance ha scritto:Stephen A. Smith criticizes Bulls management for not re-signing Nate and Marco ("you keep Belinelli, you keep Nate Robinson...come hell or high water"), the major impact being the Bulls won't get past Indiana or Miami in the playoffs, another possibly Rose starts to look for a way out of Chicago.

As much as I like the Spurs, I still think the Bulls was and is a better fit for Marco. I also thought Dunleavy wasn't meant to be Marco's replacement, but a complementary piece off the bench. What could have been...a bench of Kirk-Marco-Dunleavy-Taj, would have been nice. Too bad.

http://espn.go.com/espnradio/play?id=9951299

Why do you think Bulls were a better fit than Spurs for Marco? I don't think you're wrong, I still have to have my own opinion on that, but I am curious to know why you think this.

leggere una frase come questa su un blog americano mi emoziona TANTISSIMO:

The Spurs are 5-1. They're tough as always. A noon Sunday start may soften them a bit, but Parker is still a menace off the dribble, Duncan is still Duncan, Kawhi Leonard and Manu Ginobili are still killers, the shooters can still shoot, and god dammit they have Marco Belinelli now. I hope you're ready, Knicks.

The Huge ha scritto:Why do you think Bulls were a better fit than Spurs for Marco? I don't think you're wrong, I still have to have my own opinion on that, but I am curious to know why you think this.

Maybe 'fit' isn't the right word. Honestly I had no idea Pop plays such a guard-heavy lineup, so Beli can certainly thrive with the Spurs. It's just that on the Spurs Marco is a wing among many; he'd have a far greater impact if he was still with the Bulls as apparently no one on that team can create their own offense!

Let's face it Marco signed with the Spurs because he thinks they have the better chance to win a ring. I just think the Spurs are going to fall off fast after that, but maybe he doesn't think that far ahead.

Per carità, Leonard e Green sono forti, ma il Beli non ha paura veramente di nessuno.
Go beli starter and go Spurs

Grandissimo Beli, mi dispiace solo che la partita sia finita dopo pochi minuti...
GO SPURS...

The Huge ha scritto:

sundance ha scritto:Stephen A. Smith criticizes Bulls management for not re-signing Nate and Marco ("you keep Belinelli, you keep Nate Robinson...come hell or high water"), the major impact being the Bulls won't get past Indiana or Miami in the playoffs, another possibly Rose starts to look for a way out of Chicago.

As much as I like the Spurs, I still think the Bulls was and is a better fit for Marco. I also thought Dunleavy wasn't meant to be Marco's replacement, but a complementary piece off the bench. What could have been...a bench of Kirk-Marco-Dunleavy-Taj, would have been nice. Too bad.

http://espn.go.com/espnradio/play?id=9951299

Why do you think Bulls were a better fit than Spurs for Marco? I don't think you're wrong, I still have to have my own opinion on that, but I am curious to know why you think this.

C'mon man! Your English is about as funny as a screen door on a submarine

lolol well it's an Italian forum after all, I appreciate everyone who can respond in English

2° +/- della squadra 9+4+4

Per chi se lo volesse andare a vedere, primo quarto del Beli assolutamente spettacolare...

Palerio ha scritto: C'mon man! Your English is about as funny as a screen door on a submarine

You are young. Learn English for Umarelles like me and Ale is an adventure.